Why a Crawl Space Vapor Barrier Matters in San Diego

Most crawl space problems trace back to one source: moisture. Damp soil under a house releases water vapor upward continuously, and that moisture feeds mold, ruins insulation, corrodes ductwork, and creates the conditions rodents and pests prefer. A vapor barrier is the practical defense against all of it, a heavy sheet laid over the soil that blocks the moisture at its source. For San Diego homes, crawl space vapor barrier installation is one of the most effective moisture-control measures available.

Attic Guard installs vapor barriers as part of its crawl space work, treating moisture control as the foundation that makes everything else in the space hold up. Insulation, ductwork, and framing all last longer and perform better when the ground moisture is controlled. For homeowners across San Diego County, Orange County, and southwest Riverside County, crawl space vapor barrier installation addresses the root cause behind a long list of crawl space troubles rather than chasing the symptoms one at a time.

Where Crawl Space Moisture Comes From

The bare soil in a typical crawl space is never truly dry. Ground moisture wicks up through it and evaporates into the air of the crawl space, and in a region touched by the coastal marine layer, the humid outside air adds to the load. The result is a crawl space that stays damp, especially in the still air under a house where moisture has little chance to escape. That persistent dampness is the engine behind most of what goes wrong down there.

San Diego's climate shapes this in specific ways. The marine layer brings humidity that settles into low, enclosed spaces, and even inland, the temperature difference between the cool ground and the warmer house draws moisture upward. Without a barrier between the soil and the space, that moisture has a clear path into the insulation, the framing, and the air the home eventually breathes. Crawl space vapor barrier installation cuts off that path, which is why it addresses so many problems at once.

What Moisture Does to a Home

Unchecked crawl space moisture causes damage that spreads well beyond the crawl space. It soaks into insulation, and wet insulation loses its value and can grow mold. It feeds mold and mildew on the wood framing and the underside of the subfloor, which over time can lead to rot and structural concern. It corrodes metal ductwork, fasteners, and other components, shortening their life. And because crawl space air rises into the home, that moisture and any mold travel upstairs.

The effects reach comfort and health as well as structure. A damp crawl space contributes to a musty home, higher humidity in the living space, and the kind of air quality problems that show up as persistent smells or allergy symptoms. Left alone, the moisture keeps working at the house indefinitely. Crawl space vapor barrier installation interrupts this by blocking the moisture before it enters the space, protecting the insulation, framing, ductwork, and air all at once.

How a Vapor Barrier Works

A vapor barrier is a heavy polyethylene sheet laid across the crawl space soil, and often up the foundation walls, to block the water vapor rising from the ground. The material is thick and durable, chosen to withstand the crawl space environment and any foot traffic during future service work. Properly installed, it covers the soil completely, with the seams overlapped and the edges detailed so moisture cannot slip past at the gaps.

The installation quality determines how well it performs. A barrier with gaps, thin coverage, or poorly sealed seams lets moisture through and undercuts the whole purpose. Done right, the barrier creates a continuous separation between the damp soil and the crawl space, dramatically reducing the moisture entering the air. Crawl space vapor barrier installation is straightforward in concept but depends on thorough, careful coverage to deliver the moisture control that protects the home above.

Bare soil releases moisture constantly

The exposed soil in a crawl space wicks up ground moisture and releases it as vapor into the space continuously, which is why covering the ground is central to controlling crawl space dampness.

Moisture drives most crawl space problems

Mold, ruined insulation, corroded ductwork, and pest-friendly conditions all trace back to excess moisture, so controlling it with a vapor barrier addresses the root cause behind many separate issues.

Seam detailing makes the difference

A vapor barrier only works if the soil is fully covered with overlapped seams and sealed edges, since gaps let moisture slip past and undercut the whole installation.

Vapor Barrier and the Whole Crawl Space

A vapor barrier rarely works alone; it is the foundation that makes the other crawl space improvements last. New insulation installed over a controlled, dry soil stays dry and effective. Repaired ductwork lasts longer without the corrosion damp air causes. Rodent proofing holds up better in a space that is less hospitable to pests. The vapor barrier is the moisture-control layer that the rest of the crawl space work depends on.

This is why the barrier so often goes in as part of a larger crawl space project. A cleanup removes the old contaminated material, the vapor barrier controls the ground moisture, insulation restores the thermal barrier, air sealing closes the gaps, and rodent proofing keeps pests out. Crawl space vapor barrier installation is a central piece of that system, addressing the moisture that would otherwise undermine every other improvement made under the floor.

Signs Your Crawl Space Has a Moisture Problem

Homeowners can spot the signs of a moisture problem without going under the house. A persistent musty smell in the home, especially near floor vents or in ground-level rooms, often points to a damp crawl space. Higher humidity indoors, condensation on windows, and a general clamminess can trace back to moisture rising from below. Visible mold anywhere on the lower level, or insulation that seems to be failing quickly, are stronger signals still.

These symptoms are worth acting on because moisture damage compounds over time. What begins as dampness becomes mold, then wet insulation, then corroded ductwork and eventually structural concern. A free inspection confirms the moisture situation and shows whether the soil is releasing vapor into the space. Where it is, crawl space vapor barrier installation is the direct fix, addressing the moisture at its source before it works further damage on the home above.

Vapor Barrier and Encapsulation

A vapor barrier over the soil is the core of crawl space moisture control, and it is sometimes part of a broader approach called encapsulation. Encapsulation extends the barrier up the foundation walls and seals the space more completely, turning the crawl space into a closed, controlled environment. Whether a home needs a soil vapor barrier or a fuller encapsulation depends on the space, the moisture level, and the homeowner's goals.

For many San Diego homes, a well-installed soil vapor barrier delivers the moisture control the space needs at a sensible cost. More severe moisture situations may call for the fuller approach. The right scope is a judgment made during the inspection, based on the actual conditions rather than a one-size answer. Crawl space vapor barrier installation, at whatever scope the space requires, is the foundation of controlling the moisture that drives crawl space problems in the region.

Protecting Your Insulation Investment

Anyone investing in new crawl space insulation has a direct stake in moisture control, because moisture is what ruins insulation fastest. Fiberglass that absorbs dampness loses its insulating value and can hold moisture against the framing, and installing fresh insulation over uncontrolled ground moisture invites the same failure that likely claimed the old material. The vapor barrier protects that insulation investment by keeping the space dry.

This is why the two so often go in together. A vapor barrier laid before or alongside new insulation gives the insulation a dry environment in which to perform, so it delivers its full value for years rather than degrading early. Crawl space vapor barrier installation is, in this sense, insurance on the insulation and the other improvements in the space, protecting them from the moisture that would otherwise shorten their useful life under a San Diego home.

Why Professional Installation Matters

A vapor barrier looks simple, but its performance depends entirely on the quality of the installation. Complete soil coverage, properly overlapped and sealed seams, careful detailing around piers and the foundation, and durable material all determine whether the barrier actually controls moisture or just partly covers the ground. Gaps and poor seams let vapor through and undercut the whole purpose, which is easy to get wrong without experience.

A professional crew brings the right material and the attention to detail the job requires, working in a tight space to cover the soil thoroughly and detail the edges correctly. Attic Guard handles this as part of its crawl space work, as a cleanup and insulation contractor rather than an exterminator, treating moisture control as the foundation of a healthy space. Professional crawl space vapor barrier installation is what turns the concept into real, lasting moisture control under the home.

The Long-Term Payoff of Moisture Control

Controlling crawl space moisture is one of those investments that keeps returning value quietly for years. Unlike a repair that fixes a single failure, a vapor barrier changes the environment under the house permanently, protecting everything in the space from the dampness that would otherwise degrade it. The insulation lasts, the framing stays sound, the ductwork resists corrosion, and the air entering the home from below is drier and cleaner.

That durability makes moisture control an easy improvement to justify. A well-installed barrier requires no ongoing attention and keeps doing its job season after season, in a climate where the marine layer never stops adding humidity. For a homeowner thinking about the long-term health of a house, crawl space vapor barrier installation is a foundational step that pays back through the damage it prevents and the life it adds to every other improvement in the space.

Moisture, Mold, and Indoor Air

The link between crawl space moisture and the air a family breathes deserves particular attention. A damp crawl space grows mold, and because crawl space air rises into the living space, mold spores and humidity travel upward into the home. This is why a musty smell, higher indoor humidity, and even allergy symptoms often trace back to moisture under the floor rather than anything in the living space itself.

Controlling the moisture addresses this at the source. With a vapor barrier blocking the ground moisture, the crawl space stays drier, mold has less to feed on, and the air rising into the home is cleaner and less humid. A vapor barrier, especially paired with a cleanup that removes any existing mold and contamination, is a direct way to improve the indoor air of a home from the ground up rather than treating the symptoms upstairs.

A Foundation for a Healthier Home

It helps to think of a vapor barrier not as a standalone product but as the foundation that makes a crawl space healthy. Nearly every problem that develops under a house, failed insulation, mold, corroded ducts, pest-friendly conditions, poor air, has moisture somewhere in its history. Address the moisture, and the space becomes far more resistant to all of it. That is the quiet power of getting the moisture control right from the start.

For a San Diego homeowner, where the marine layer keeps humidity in play year round, that foundation is worth building. A dry, controlled crawl space supports every other improvement and protects the home above from the slow damage that moisture causes. A vapor barrier is the unglamorous but essential first move toward a crawl space that helps the house rather than harming it, which is exactly why it belongs near the top of the list.

Getting a Vapor Barrier Installed

Controlling crawl space moisture is one of the higher-value things a homeowner can do for the long-term health of a house, and a vapor barrier is the core of it. The process starts with a free inspection that assesses the moisture situation, the condition of the soil and the space, and what coverage the barrier needs, all documented with photos and laid out in a written quote with no hidden fees. Financing is available for larger projects.

Attic Guard serves San Diego and the surrounding counties from its Escondido shop, licensed through the California State License Board (CSLB #1138505) and family owned rather than a national chain. Any homeowner dealing with a damp, musty crawl space or protecting a home against moisture can arrange vapor barrier installation in San Diego by calling (858) 330-6197 to assess the moisture and plan the work.

 

 

Orthohantavirus
Transmission electron micrograph of "Sin Nombre virus"
Transmission electron micrograph of Sin Nombre virus
Virus classification Edit this classification
(unranked): Virus
Realm: Riboviria
Kingdom: Orthornavirae
Phylum: Negarnaviricota
Class: Bunyaviricetes
Order: Elliovirales
Family: Hantaviridae
Subfamily: Mammantavirinae
Genus: Orthohantavirus
Species

#Classification

Synonyms[1]
  • Hantavirus

Orthohantavirus is a genus of viruses which includes all hantaviruses that cause disease in humans. Hantaviruses are naturally found primarily in rodents. In general, each hantavirus is carried by one rodent species and each rodent that carries a hantavirus carries one hantavirus species. Hantaviruses in their natural reservoirs usually cause an asymptomatic, persistent infection. In humans, however, hantaviruses cause two diseases: hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS). HFRS is mainly caused by hantaviruses in Africa, Asia, and Europe, called Old World hantaviruses, and HPS is usually caused by hantaviruses in the Americas, called New World hantaviruses.

Hantaviruses are transmitted mainly through aerosols and droplets that contain rodent excretions, as well as through contaminated food, bites, and scratches. Environmental factors such as rainfall, temperature, and humidity influence transmission. HFRS is marked by kidney disease with kidney swelling, excess protein in urine, and blood in urine. The case fatality rate of HFRS varies from less than 1% to 15% depending on the virus. A mild form of HFRS called nephropathia epidemica is often caused by Puumala virus and Dobrava-Belgrade virus. For HPS, initial symptoms are flu-like, with fever, headache, and muscle pain, followed by sudden respiratory failure. HPS has a higher case fatality rate than HFRS, at 30–60%. For both HFRS and HPS, illness is the result of increased vascular permeability, decreased platelet count, and overreaction of the immune system.

The hantavirus genome consists of three single-stranded negative-sense RNA segments that encode one protein each: an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), a spike glycoprotein precursor, and the N protein. Segments are encased in N proteins to form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes that each have a copy of RdRp attached. RNP complexes are surrounded by a lipid envelope that has spike proteins emanating from its surface. Replication begins when spikes attach to the surface of cells. After entering the cell, the envelope fuses with endosomes and lysosomes, which empties RNPs into the cytoplasm. RdRp then transcribes the genome to produce messenger RNA (mRNA) for translation by host ribosomes to produce viral proteins and replicates the genome for progeny viruses. Old World hantaviruses assemble in the Golgi apparatus and obtain their envelope from it, before being transported to the cell membrane to leave the cell via exocytosis. New World hantaviruses assemble near the cell membrane and obtain their envelope from it as they leave the cell by budding from its surface.

Hantaviruses were first discovered following the Korean War. During the war, HFRS was a common ailment in soldiers stationed near the Hantan River. The first hantavirus was isolated in 1978 in South Korea and was named Hantaan virus. It was shown to be responsible for the outbreak during the war. Within a few years, other hantaviruses that cause HFRS were discovered throughout Eurasia. In 1982, the World Health Organization gave HFRS its name, and in 1987, hantaviruses were classified as a genus for the first time. In 1993, an outbreak of HPS occurred in the Four Corners region in the United States, which led to the discovery of pathogenic New World hantaviruses and the second disease caused by hantaviruses. Since then, hantaviruses have been found not just in rodents but also in moles, shrews, and bats.

Disease

[edit]
World distribution of select hantaviruses   HCPS   NE/HFRS   HFRS
World distribution of select hantaviruses
  HCPS
  NE/HFRS
  HFRS

Hantaviruses are sorted into Old World hantaviruses (OWHVs), which typically cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Africa, Asia, and Europe, and New World hantaviruses (NWHVs) which are associated with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in the Americas. The case fatality rate of HFRS ranges from less than 1% to 15%, while for HPS it is 30–60%.[2][3][4][5] The severity of symptoms of HFRS varies depending on the virus: Hantaan virus causes severe HFRS, Seoul virus moderate HFRS, Puumala virus mild HFRS,[6] and Dobrava-Belgrade virus infection varies from mild to severe depending on genotype.[7] The mild form of HFRS caused by Puumala virus and Dobrava-Belgrade virus is often called nephropathia epidemica (NE).[8][9] Repeated infections of hantaviruses have not been observed, so recovering from infection likely grants life-long immunity.[10][11]

HFRS is characterized by five phases: febrile, hypotensive, low urine production (oliguria), high urine production (polyuria), and recovery. Symptoms usually occur 12–16 days after exposure to the virus.[12] Acute kidney disease occurs with kidney swelling, excess protein in urine (proteinuria), and blood in urine (hematuria). Other symptoms include headache, lower back pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bloody stool, the appearance of spots on the skin (petechiae), and hemorrhaging in the respiratory tract.[2][13] Renal failure leads to oliguria, and restoration of kidney health comes with polyuria.[2][6] Recovery typically takes a few months.[14] In more mild cases, the different phases of HFRS may be hard to distinguish,[15] or some phases may be absent, while in more severe cases, the phases may overlap.[6]

HPS is mainly caused by two viruses: Andes virus and Sin Nombre virus. The disease has three phases: prodromal (early), cardiopulmonary, and recovery. Symptoms occur about 1–8 weeks after exposure to the virus. Early symptoms include fever, headache, muscle pain, shortness of breath (dyspnea), and low platelet count (thrombocytopenia). During the cardiopulmonary phase, there is elevated heart rate (tachycardia), irregular heartbeats (arrhythmias), and cardiogenic shock. Pulmonary capillary leakage can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome, buildup of fluids in the lungs (pulmonary edema), hypotension, and buildup of fluid in the chest cavity (pleural effusion). These symptoms can cause sudden death.[2][5][16] After the cardiopulmonary phase is resolved, recovery typically takes 3 to 6 months,[16] with polyuria. While HFRS is associated with renal disease and HPS with cardiopulmonary disease, HFRS may sometimes include cardiopulmonary symptoms associated with HPS and HPS may sometimes include renal symptoms associated with HFRS.[16][17]

Transmission

[edit]
A computer-generated image of hantavirus transmission from rodents to humans through aerosols
Hantavirus transmission
A front-view photograph of a bank vole sitting on the ground and looking right
The bank vole, the natural reservoir of Puumala virus
A photograph of a deer mouse in a tree looking right
The western deer mouse, the natural reservoir of Sin Nombre virus

Hantaviruses that cause illness in humans are mainly transmitted by rodents. In rodents, hantaviruses usually cause an asymptomatic, persistent infection. Infected animals can spread the virus to uninfected animals through aerosols or droplets from their feces, urine, saliva,[6] and blood,[18] through consumption of contaminated food, from virus particles shed from skin or fur,[19] via grooming,[5] or through biting and scratching. Hantaviruses can also spread through the fecal-oral route and across the placenta during pregnancy from mother to child. They can survive for 10 days at room temperature,[2] 15 days in a temperate environment,[8] and more than 18 days at 4 °C (39 °F), which aids in the transmission of the virus.[2] Environmental conditions favorable to the reproduction and spread of rodents are known to increase disease transmission.[3] Living in a rural environment, in unhygienic settings, and interacting with environments shared with hosts are the biggest risk factors for infection, especially among people who are hikers,[6] farmers, and forestry workers,[8] as well as those in mining, the military,[19][20] and zoology.[16]

Human-to-human transmission of Andes virus is sometimes reported. Although a systematic review of research did not find sufficient evidence of such transmission,[3] many experts consider it to be possible between close contacts while noting that ANDV is not highly transmissible.[21][22] It can reportedly spread through human saliva, airborne droplets from coughing and sneezing, and possibly to newborns through breast milk or the placenta.[2] There is also suspicion that Puumala virus can spread from person to person through blood and platelet transfusions.[23]

Hantaviruses that cause HFRS can be transmitted through the bites of mites and ticks.[24] Research has also shown that pigs can be infected with Hantaan virus without severe symptoms, and sows can transmit the virus to offspring through the placenta. Pig-to-human transmission may also be possible; one swine breeder was infected with hantavirus with no contact with rodents or mites. Hantaan virus and Puumala virus have been detected in cattle, deer, and rabbits, and antibodies to Seoul virus have been detected in cats and dogs, but the role of these hosts for hantaviruses is unknown.[2] Hantaviruses can also spread among rats kept as pets. For example, in an outbreak in North America in 2017, Seoul virus infected 31 people through contact with pet rats.[2] In addition to rodents, some hantaviruses are found in small insectivorous mammals, such as moles,[2][25] shrews, and bats.[9][16] Hantavirus antigen, indicative of infection, has also been detected in a variety of bird species.[24] Infection in other animals can potentially facilitate the evolution of hantaviruses by gene reassortment.[16]

Human built environments are important in hantavirus transmission. Deforestation and excess agriculture may destroy rodents' natural habitat.[16] The expansion of agricultural land is associated with a decline in predator populations, which enables hantavirus host species to use farm monocultures as nesting and foraging sites. Agricultural sites built in close proximity to rodents' natural habitats can facilitate the proliferation of rodents as they may be attracted to animal feed.[18][26] Sewers and stormwater drainage systems may be inhabited by rodents, especially in areas with poor solid waste management. Maritime trade and travel have also been implicated in the spread of hantaviruses.[18] Research results are inconsistent on whether urban living increases or decreases hantavirus incidence.[26] Seroprevalence, which shows past infection to hantavirus, is consistently higher in occupations and areas that have greater exposure to rodents.[22] Poor living conditions on battlefields, in military camps, and in refugee camps expose soldiers and refugees to infection.[20]

Environment

[edit]
A diagram of El Niño's effects on the climates of different regions of the world
El Niño's effect on local climates

Rodent species that carry hantaviruses inhabit a diverse range of habitats, including desert-like biomes, equatorial and tropical forests, swamps, savannas, fields, and salt marshes.[18] The seroprevalence of hantaviruses in their host species has been observed to range from 5.9% to 38% in the Americas, and 3% to about 19% worldwide, depending on testing method and location.[19][27] In some places, such as South Korea, routine trapping of wild rodents is performed to surveil hantavirus circulation.[4] High humidity can benefit rodent populations in warm climates, where it may positively impact plant growth and thus food availability.[18] Increased forest coverage is associated with increased hantavirus incidence, particularly in Europe.[26]

Climate change and environmental degradation increase contact areas between rodent hosts and humans, which increases potential exposure to hantaviruses. An example of this was the 1993 Four Corners outbreak in the United States, which was immediately preceded by elevated rainfall from the 1992–1993 El Niño warming period. This caused a substantial growth in the food supply for rodents, which led to rapid growth in their population and facilitated greater spread of the hantavirus that caused that outbreak.[18][19][28]

Rainfall is consistently associated with hantavirus incidence in various patterns. Heavy rainfall is a risk factor for outbreaks in the following months,[10] but may negatively affect incidence by flooding rodent burrows and nests.[28] In places that have wet and dry seasons, infections are more common in the wet season than in the dry season.[18] Low rainfall and drought are associated with decreased incidence since such conditions result in a smaller rodent population,[28] but displacement of rodent populations via drought or flood can lead to an increase in rodent-human interactions and infections.[18] In Europe, however, no association between rainfall and disease incidence has been found.[28]

Temperature has varying effects on hantavirus transmission. Higher temperatures create unfavorable environments for virus survival and decreases activity levels of Neotropic rodents, but it can cause rodents to seek shelter from heat in human settings and is beneficial for aerosol production.[16][18] Lower temperature can prolong virus survival outside a host.[18] Higher average winter temperature is associated with reduced survival of bank voles, the natural reservoir of Puumala virus, but increased survival of striped field mice in China, the natural reservoirs of Hantaan virus.[28] Extreme temperatures, whether hot or cold, are associated with lower disease incidence.[10]

Genome and structure

[edit]
A transmission electron micrograph of Sin Nombre virus, showing numerous virions next to a cell
A transmission electron micrograph of Sin Nombre virus

The genome of hantaviruses is segmented into three parts: the large (L), medium (M), and small (S) segments. Each part is a single-stranded negative-sense RNA strand and consists of 10,000–15,000 nucleotides in total.[5] The segments form into circles via non-covalent bonding of the ends of the genome.[29] The L segment is about 6.6 kilobases (kb) in length[19] and encodes a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which mediates transcription and replication of viral RNA. The M segment, about 3.7 kb in length,[19] encodes a glycoprotein precursor that is co-translated and cleaved into Gn and Gc. Gn and Gc bind to cell receptors, regulate immune responses, and induce protective antibodies. The S segment is around 2.1 kb in length[19] and encodes the nucleocapsid protein N, which binds to and protects viral RNA. An open reading frame in the N gene on the S segment[30] of some orthohantaviruses also encodes the non-structural protein NS that inhibits interferon production in host cells. The untranslated regions at the ends of the genome are highly conserved and participate in the replication and transcription of the genome.[2][5][6]

Individual hantavirus particles (virions) are usually spherical, but may be oval, pleomorphic,[31] or tubular.[5] The diameter of the virion is 70–350 nanometers (nm).[19] The outer part of the virion is a lipid envelope that is about 5 nm thick. Embedded in the envelope are the surface spike glycoproteins Gn and Gc,[2] which are arranged in a lattice pattern.[19] Each surface spike is composed of a tetramer of Gn and Gc (four units each) that has four-fold rotational symmetry, and extends about 10 nm out from the envelope.[19] Gn forms the stalk of the spike and Gc the head.[5] Inside the envelope are helical nucleocapsids made of many copies of the nucleocapsid protein N, which are attached to the virus's genome to form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. Each RNP complex has a copy of RdRp attached to it.[2] Hantaviruses do not encode matrix proteins to assist with structuring the virion, so how surface proteins organize into a sphere with a symmetrical lattice is not yet known.[32]

Life cycle

[edit]
Ten major steps of the hantavirus life cycle.
Ten major steps of the hantavirus life cycle.

Vascular endothelial cells and macrophages are the primary cells infected by hantaviruses.[9] Podocytes, tubular cells, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes can also be infected.[2][16] Attachment and entry into the host cell is mediated by the binding of the viral glycoprotein spikes to host cell receptors, particularly β3 integrins. Decay acceleration factors, complement receptors, and, for New World hantaviruses, protocadherin-1 have also been proposed to be involved in attachment.[16][32] After attachment, hantaviruses rely on several ways to enter a cell, including micropinocytosis, clathrin-independent receptor-mediated endocytosis and cholesterol- or caveolae-dependent endocytosis.[2][5][16] Old World hantaviruses use clathrin-dependent endocytosis while New World hantaviruses use clathrin-independent endocytosis.[16][23][33]

After entering a cell, virions form vesicles that are transported to early endosomes, then late endosomes and lysosomal compartments. A decrease in pH then causes the viral envelope to fuse with the endosome or lysosome.[19][23][33] This fusion releases viral ribonucleoprotein complexes into the cell cytoplasm, which initiates transcription and replication by RdRp.[2][16][19] RdRp transcribes viral –ssRNA into complementary positive-sense strands, then snatches 5′ ("five prime") ends of host messenger RNA (mRNA) to prepare mRNA for translation by host ribosomes to produce viral proteins.[5][19] Complementary RNA strands are also used to produce copies of the genome, which are encapsulated by N proteins to form RNPs.[2][16][19]

During virion assembly, the glycoprotein precursor is cleaved in the endoplasmic reticulum into the Gn and Gc glycoproteins by host cell signal peptidases.[2][5] Gn and Gc are modified by N-glycan chains, which stabilize the spike structure and assist in assembly in the Golgi apparatus for Old World hantaviruses[2] or at the cell membrane for New World hantaviruses.[16] Old World hantaviruses obtain their viral envelope from the Golgi apparatus and are then transported to the cell membrane in vesicles to leave the cell via exocytosis. On the other hand, New World hantavirus RNPs are transported to the cell membrane, where they bud from the surface of the cell to obtain their envelope and leave the cell.[16][19][23]

Evolution

[edit]
Orthohantavirus phylogeny
 

Asikkala virus

 
 

Kenkeme virus

 
 

Artybash virus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

Asama virus

 


 

Wùfeng Chodsigoa smithii orthohantavirus 1

 
 

Cao Bằng virus

 

 

 

 


 

Bowé virus

 
 

Jeju virus

 

 

 

 


 

Tigray virus

 
 

Bruges virus

 

 

 

 

 


 

Lanka virus

 
 

Thailand virus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Seoul virus

 
 

Dobrava virus

 
 

Sangassou virus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hantaan virus

 
 

Dàbiéshān virus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 


 

Puumala virus

 
 

Khabarovsk virus

 
 
 
 
 

Tatenale virus

 
 
 
 
 

Tula virus

 
 
 
 
 

Prospect Hill virus

 
 

LúxÄ« virus

 
 

Fúgòng virus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Rockport virus

 
 

Carrizal virus

 
 

Montaño virus

 
 

Sin Nombre virus

 
 
 
 
 

Andes virus

 
 

Rio Mamoré virus

 
 
 
 
 

Maporal virus

 
 
 
 
 

Choclo virus

 
 
 
 
 

Caño Delgadito virus

 
 

Bayou virus

 
 

Black Creek Canal virus

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 


A phylogenetic tree of orthohantaviruses based on S and M genome segment sequences[34]

The most common form of evolution for hantaviruses is mutations through single nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions.[2] Hantaviruses are usually restricted to individual natural reservoir species and evolve alongside their hosts,[2] but this one-species-one-hantavirus relationship is not true for all hantaviruses. The exact evolutionary history of hantaviruses is likely obscured by many instances of genome reassortment, host spillover, and host-switching.[35] Within species, geography has affected the evolution of hantaviruses. For example, Hantaan virus and Seoul virus have both formed multiple lineages corresponding to their geographic distribution.[2]

Because hantaviruses have segmented genomes, they are capable of genetic recombination and reassortment in which segments from different viruses can combine to form new viruses. This occurs often in nature and facilitates the adaptation of hantaviruses to multiple hosts and ecosystems. Recombination in OWHVs of the S and M segments is usually observed amongst viruses within species, but can occur between species. Reassortment in NWHVs of the S and M segments has been observed in rodents. Among Puumala viruses isolated from rodents in 2005–2009, 19.1% of them were identified as reassortments.[2][36] Diploid progeny are also possible, in which virions may possess two of the same segment from two parent viruses.[25]

Classification

[edit]

Orthohantaviruses belong to the family Hantaviridae, which contains all hantaviruses. The genus has 37 species, listed hereafter with the exemplar virus of the species. In general, species bear the name of the exemplar virus with the suffix -ense.[29][37]

Many other hantaviruses are unclassified, though some may be isolates of other viruses:[29][38]

History

[edit]
A grainy portrait photograph of Ho Wang Lee
Ho Wang Lee, 1972

Hantavirus hemorrhagic disease was likely first described in the Huangdi Neijing, an ancient Chinese medical text, in Imperial China during the Warring States Period of 475–221 BCE.[35] Hantaviruses have been suggested as a cause of "trench nephritis" in soldiers during the US Civil War and in British soldiers in Flanders, Belgium[35] during the First World War. The disease was also mentioned in East Asia, where it was probably endemic, and was first described scientifically in Vladivostok in 1913–1914. During the Second World War in 1942, an outbreak of disease with symptoms characteristic of hantavirus infection occurred in Salla, Eastern Lapland, Finland among German and Finnish soldiers. This outbreak was later reported in 1980 to be caused by a virus transmitted by bank voles and was named Puumala virus.[20] Also during the war, around 10,000 Japanese soldiers stationed in Manchuria developed HFRS.[6]

Around 3,200[20] cases of HFRS occurred among United Nations soldiers stationed near the Hantan River[32] during the Korean War, where it was first identified in 1951[2] and named "Korean hemorrhagic fever" and "epidemic hemorrhagic fever".[35] After the war, in 1976 in South Korea, Ho Wang Lee[14] tested striped field mice and showed that antigens from their lungs were reactive to antibodies in sera from war survivors.[35] In 1978, the virus was isolated for the first time, and in 1980, it was named Hantaan virus after the river.[13] Retrospective analysis showed that Hantaan virus was responsible for the viral outbreak during the war.[20] Other hantaviruses that caused HFRS were then discovered throughout Eurasia. The disease had a variety of names, so in 1982, the World Health Organization officially named it hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome.[6][35] In 1985, this group of viruses were named "hantaviruses" after Hantaan virus,[31] and in 1987, the genus Hantavirus was established to accommodate them in the then-family Bunyaviridae.[1] During the 1980s, Lee and his team developed the first hantavirus vaccine, Hantavax, to prevent HFRS. The first paper on the vaccine was published in 1988, and it was licensed by the Korean government in 1990.[40]

In 1993, an outbreak of highly lethal acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred in the Four Corners region of the United States. This outbreak was determined to be caused by a hantavirus, now named Sin Nombre virus, and represented the first confirmed instance of pathogenic hantaviruses in the Americas as well as the discovery of a new type of disease caused by hantaviruses. The new disease was named hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. In subsequent years, numerous other hantaviruses were discovered in the Americas.[5][35] HFRS, however, remains much more common than HPS—more than 100,000 cases of HFRS occur each year,[26] compared to only a few hundred cases of HPS annually.[41]

Over time, hundreds of bunyaviruses were discovered but could not be accommodated within the genera of the Bunyaviridae family. To address this, in 2017 bunyaviruses were elevated to the rank of order, Bunyavirales, and hantaviruses, along with the other bunyavirus genera, were elevated to the rank of family. Hantaviruses, also called hantavirids, now also refer to members of the family Hantaviridae. The prior genus of Hantavirus was renamed Orthohantavirus to distinguish them from members of the family, and the genus's members are often called orthohantaviruses. In 2019, additional genera and subfamilies were created to classify non-rodent hantaviruses,[35] and in 2023, binomial nomenclature was adopted for hantaviruses.[2]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The exemplar virus of Orthohantavirus dobravaense is Dobrava virus, a genotype of Dobrava-Belgrade virus. In scientific papers, "Dobrava-Belgrade virus" is essentially used as a synonym for Orthohantavirus dobravaense.
  2. ^ Orthohantavirus thailandense bears the name of Thailand virus but its exemplar virus is Anjozorobe virus.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "History of the Taxon: Genus: Orthohantavirus (2023 Release, MSL #39)". ictv.global. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Retrieved 10 January 2025.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Chen R, Gong H, Wang X, Sun M, Ji Y, Tan S, Chen J, Shao J, Liao M (8 August 2023). "Zoonotic Hantaviridae with Global Public Health Significance". Viruses. 15 (8): 1705. doi:10.3390/v15081705. PMC 10459939. PMID 37632047.
  3. ^ a b c Toledo J, Haby MM, Reveiz L, Sosa Leon L, Angerami R, Aldighieri S (17 October 2022). "Evidence for Human-to-Human Transmission of Hantavirus: A Systematic Review". J Infect Dis. 226 (8): 1362–1371. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiab461. PMC 9574657. PMID 34515290.
  4. ^ a b Kim WK, Cho S, Lee SH, No JS, Lee GY, Park K, Lee D, Jeong ST, Song JW (8 January 2021). "Genomic Epidemiology and Active Surveillance to Investigate Outbreaks of Hantaviruses". Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10 532388. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.532388. PMC 7819890. PMID 33489927.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Jacob AT, Ziegler BM, Farha SM, Vivian LR, Zilinski CA, Armstrong AR, Burdette AJ, Beachboard DC, Stobart CC (9 November 2023). "Sin Nombre Virus and the Emergence of Other Hantaviruses: A Review of the Biology, Ecology, and Disease of a Zoonotic Pathogen". Biology (Basel). 12 (11) 1143. doi:10.3390/biology12111413. PMC 10669331. PMID 37998012.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Tariq M, Kim DM (March 2022). "Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Literature Review, Epidemiology, Clinical Picture and Pathogenesis". Infect Chemother. 54 (1): 1–19. doi:10.3947/ic.2021.0148. PMC 8987181. PMID 35384417.
  7. ^ Klempa B, Avsic-Zupanc T, Clement J, Dzagurova TK, Henttonen H, Heyman P, Jakab F, Kruger DH, Maes P, Papa A, Tkachenko EA, Ulrich RG, Vapalahti O, Vaheri A (2013). "Complex Evolution and Epidemiology of Dobrava-Belgrade Hantavirus: Definition of Genotypes and Their Characteristics". Arch Virol. 158 (3): 521–529. doi:10.1007/s00705-012-1514-5. PMC 3586401. PMID 23090188.
  8. ^ a b c Riccò M, Peruzzi S, Ranzieri S, Magnavita N (25 October 2021). "Occupational Hantavirus Infections in Agricultural and Forestry Workers: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis". Viruses. 13 (11) 2150. doi:10.3390/v13112150. PMC 8621010. PMID 34834957.
  9. ^ a b c Afzal S, Ali L, Batool A, Afzal M, Kanwal N, Hassan M, Safdar M, Ahmad A, Yang J (12 October 2023). "Hantavirus: An Overview and Advancements in Therapeutic Approaches for Infection". Front Microbiol. 14 1233433. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1233433. PMC 10601933. PMID 37901807.
  10. ^ a b c Hansen A, Cameron S, Liu Q, Sun Y, Weinstein P, Williams C, Han GS, Bi P (April 2015). "Transmission of Haemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome in China and the Role of Climate Factors: A Review". Int J Infect Dis. 33: 212–218. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2015.02.010. hdl:2440/94644. PMID 25704595.
  11. ^ Krüger DH, Schönrich G, Klempa B (June 2011). "Human Pathogenic Hantaviruses and Prevention of Infection". Hum Vaccin. 7 (6): 685–693. doi:10.4161/hv.7.6.15197. PMC 3219076. PMID 21508676.
  12. ^ Zhang Y, Ma R, Wang Y, Sun W, Yang Z, Han M, Han T, Wu XA, Liu R (30 September 2021). "Viruses Run: The Evasion Mechanisms of the Antiviral Innate Immunity by Hantavirus". Front Microbiol. 12 759198. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.759198. PMC 8516094. PMID 34659193.
  13. ^ a b Sehgal A, Mehta S, Sahay K, Martynova E, Rizvanov A, Baranwal M, Chandy S, Khaiboullina S, Kabwe E, Davidyuk Y (18 February 2023). "Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome in Asia: History, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention". Viruses. 15 (2) 561. doi:10.3390/v15020561. PMC 9966805. PMID 36851775.
  14. ^ a b LupuÅŸoru G, LupuÅŸoru M, Ailincăi I, Bernea L, Berechet A, Spătaru R, Ismail G (September 2021). "Hanta Hemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome: A Pathology in Whose Diagnosis Kidney Biopsy Plays a Major Role (Review)". Exp Ther Med. 22 (33) 984. doi:10.3892/etm.2021.10416. PMC 8311249. PMID 34345266.
  15. ^ Avšič-Županc T, Saksida A, Korva M (April 2019). "Hantavirus Infections". Clin Microbiol Infect. 21S: e6–e16. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12291. PMID 24750436.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Koehler FC, Di Cristanziano V, Späth MR, Hoyer-Allo KJ, Wanken M, Müller RU, Burst V (29 January 2022). "The Kidney in Hantavirus Infection-Epidemiology, Virology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis and Management". Clin Kidney J. 15 (7): 1231–1252. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfac008. PMC 9217627. PMID 35756741.
  17. ^ Noack D, Goeijenbier M, Reusken CB, Koopmans MP, Rockx BH (4 August 2020). "Orthohantavirus Pathogenesis and Cell Tropism". Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10 399. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00399. PMC 7438779. PMID 32903721.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Douglas KO, Payne K, Sabino-Santos G Jr, Agard J (23 December 2021). "Influence of Climatic Factors on Human Hantavirus Infections in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review". Pathogens. 11 (1) 15. doi:10.3390/pathogens11010015. PMC 8778283. PMID 35055965.
  19. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o D'Souza MH, Patel TR (7 August 2020). "Biodefense Implications of New-World Hantaviruses". Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 8 925. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00925. PMC 7426369. PMID 32850756.
  20. ^ a b c d e Mustonen J, Henttonen H, Vaheri A (27 February 2024). "Hantavirus Infections Among Military Forces". Mil Med. 189 (3–4): 551–555. doi:10.1093/milmed/usad261. PMC 10898924. PMID 37428512.
  21. ^ Maes P, Tischler N (12 May 2026). "Statement From the International Hantavirus Society and Members of the International Hantavirus Research and Clinical Community Regarding the Current Andes Virus Outbreak Investigation". Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20134326.
  22. ^ a b Tortosa F, Perre F, Tognetti C, Lossetti L, Carrasco G, Guaresti G, Iglesias A, Espasandin Y, Izcovich A (19 September 2024). "Seroprevalence of Hantavirus Infection in Non-Epidemic Settings Over Four Decades: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". BMC Public Health. 24 (1) 2553. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20014-w. PMC 11414058. PMID 39300359.
  23. ^ a b c d Meier K, Thorkelsson SR, Quemin ER, Rosenthal M (6 August 2021). "Hantavirus Replication Cycle-An Updated Structural Virology Perspective". Viruses. 13 (8) 1561. doi:10.3390/v13081561. PMC 8402763. PMID 34452426.
  24. ^ a b Tkachenko E, Balkina A, Trankvilevsky D, Kolyasnikova N, Teodorovich R, Vorovich M, Popova Y, Kurashova S, Egorova M, Belyakova A, Tkachenko P, Ishmukhametov A, Dzagurova T (13 August 2024). "The Specificity of Epizootic and Epidemiological Processes in Natural Foci of Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome and Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Russia, as the Basis for the Prospects of Creating a Combined Vaccine for the Prevention of These Infections". Viruses. 16 (8) 1292. doi:10.3390/v16081292. PMC 11359185. PMID 39205266.
  25. ^ a b Klempa B (October 2018). "Reassortment Events in the Evolution of Hantaviruses". Virus Genes. 54 (5): 638–646. doi:10.1007/s11262-018-1590-z. PMC 6153690. PMID 30047031.
  26. ^ a b c d Moirano G, Botta A, Yang M, Mangeruga M, Murray K, Vineis P (July 2024). "Land-Cover, Land-Use and Human Hantavirus Infection Risk: A Systematic Review". Pathog Glob Health. 118 (5): 361–375. doi:10.1080/20477724.2023.2272097. PMC 11338209. PMID 37876214.
  27. ^ Obando-Rico CJ, Valencia-Grajales YF, Bonilla-Aldana DK (January–February 2023). "Prevalence of Orthohantavirus in Rodents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Travel Med Infect Dis. 51 102504. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102504. PMID 36402291.
  28. ^ a b c d e Tian H, Stenseth NC (21 February 2021). "The Ecological Dynamics of Hantavirus Diseases: From Environmental Variability to Disease Prevention Largely Based on Data From China". PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 13 (2) e0006901. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006901. PMC 6383869. PMID 30789905.
  29. ^ a b c "Genus: Orthohantavirus". International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Retrieved 10 January 2025.
  30. ^ Bae JY, Kim JI, Park MS, Lee GE, Park H, Song KJ, Park MS (18 May 2021). "The Immune Correlates of Orthohantavirus Vaccine". Vaccines. 9 (5) 518. doi:10.3390/vaccines9050518. PMC 8157935. PMID 34069997.
  31. ^ a b Deng X, Tian S, Yu Z, Wang L, Liang R, Li Y, Xiang R, Jiang S, Ying T, Yu F (July–August 2020). "Development of Small-Molecule Inhibitors Against Hantaviruses". Microbes Infect. 22 (6–7): 272–277. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2020.05.011. PMID 32445882.
  32. ^ a b c Guardado-Calvo P, Rey FA (October 2021). "The Surface Glycoproteins of Hantaviruses". Curr Opin Virol. 50: 87–94. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2021.07.009. PMID 34418649.
  33. ^ a b LaPointe A, Gale M Jr, Kell AM (9 May 2023). "Orthohantavirus Replication in the Context of Innate Immunity". Viruses. 15 (5) 1130. doi:10.3390/v15051130. PMC 10220641. PMID 37243216.
  34. ^ Bradfute SB, Calisher CH, Klempa B, Klingström J, Kuhn JH, Laenen L, Tischler ND, Maes P (April 2024). "ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Hantaviridae 2024". J Gen Virol. 105 (4) 001975. doi:10.1099/jgv.0.001975. PMC 11094369. PMID 38587456.
  35. ^ a b c d e f g h Kuhn JH, Schmaljohn CS (28 February 2023). "A Brief History of Bunyaviral Family Hantaviridae". Diseases. 11 (1): 38. doi:10.3390/diseases11010038. PMC 10047430. PMID 36975587.
  36. ^ Kabwe E, Davidyuk Y, Shamsutdinov A, Garanina E, Martynova E, Kitaeva K, Malisheni M, Isaeva G, Savitskaya T, Urbanowicz RA, Morzunov S, Katongo C, Rizvanov A, Khaiboullina S (22 September 2020). "Orthohantaviruses, Emerging Zoonotic Pathogens". Pathogens. 9 (9) 775. doi:10.3390/pathogens9090775. PMC 7558059. PMID 32971887.
  37. ^ "Virus Taxonomy: 2024 Release". International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Retrieved 17 March 2025.
  38. ^ Kuhn JH, Bradfute SB, Calisher CH, Klempa B, Klingström J, Laenen L, Palacios G, Schmaljohn CS, Tischler N, Maes P (23 June 2023). "Reevaluate and Reorganize Family Hantaviridae (Order Bunyavirales)" (zip). International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Retrieved 10 January 2025.
  39. ^ "History of the Taxon: Species: Orthohantavirus seewisense (2022 Release, MSL #38)". International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Retrieved 10 January 2025.
  40. ^ Song JW (2022). "In Memoriam: Professor Ho Wang Lee (1928–2022)". J Korean Med Sci. 37 (36) e274. doi:10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e274. PMC 9485066.
  41. ^ Engdahl TB, Crowe Jr JE (15 July 2020). "Humoral Immunity to Hantavirus Infection". mSphere. 15 (4) e00482-20. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00482-20. PMC 7364217. PMID 32669473.
[edit]

 

Redirect to:

 

It is a heavy polyethylene sheet laid over the crawl space soil to block water vapor rising from the ground. By cutting off the main source of crawl space moisture, it helps protect insulation, framing, and ductwork from dampness and mold, and reduces the humidity and musty air that reach the home above.
Often yes. The coastal marine layer adds humidity, and bare crawl space soil releases ground moisture regardless of the weather. That moisture feeds mold, ruins insulation, and corrodes ductwork. A vapor barrier controls it at the source, which is why it is a common recommendation for San Diego crawl spaces.
Frequently. The vapor barrier controls the moisture that would otherwise undermine insulation, ductwork, and rodent proofing, so it often goes in as part of a larger project. Installing it alongside cleanup, insulation, and sealing lets the whole crawl space perform as one moisture-controlled system.